Information about the Pointing of the 100-m Telescope
    (J. Neidhöfer, MPIfR)
    Last update: 30-Aug-2001 / jn

      Introduction

The aim of this description is to inform interested people about the actual situation at the Effelsberg 100-m telescope concerning pointing and focussing. The adopted pointing model is presented by the equations used in the software. The influence of the observer on the pointing and focussing during his session is described. It finishes with some general remarks and advice for the users. For more information about how to do pointing and focussing with the telescope one should have a look in the OBSE and the OBSinp manuals.

      History

The Pointing constants for the 100-m telescope are based on the theory by P.Stumpff (Stumpff, 1972) and have afterwards been extended and slightly changed due to observations with the telescope in the first years of operation (Pauliny-Toth,Altenhoff, 1972; Brosche, 1975). During a Pointing-Workshop held in Bonn (Altenhoff,1996) general problems of pointing models and the pointing of the 100-m telescope in special have been discussed. The actual set of constants for the different foci and receivers is determined during special pointing observations by a "pointing-committee" of the MPIfR. The latest changes in the set of pointing-corrections are made because of proposals by W.J. Altenhoff. He determined influences of the (sometimes high) offset-position in azimut of receivers in the secondary focus to the pointing in elevation at high elevation. That is corrected by an additive term Phorn to the correction value in elevation. He also determined a systematic pointing difference, if the telescope has moved 360 degrees. That is assumed to be influenced by the cable-twist in azimut, which is now be corrected by another constant with an additive term Pcableto the correction value in azimut

      The Coordinates of the Telescope

In the drive program for the telescope the following coordinates are used for the position of the Effelsberg 100-m telescope:
 
Longitude:  -00 27 32.10 s 
Latitude: +50 31 30 " 
Altitude: 366 m

Pointing Constants of the 100-m Telescope

      Constant terms

  • P2: Collimation of the telescope ( inclination between antenna-beam and the horizontal axis)
  • P7: Zero-shift of the elevation-value readout
    • Terms changing with azimut and elevation

  • P1: Zero-shift of the azimut-value readout
  • P3: Collimation of the axes (inclination betwenn the vertical and horizontal axes of rotation)
  • P4,P5: Shift between the instrumental zenit and the real one
  • P6: Errors due to geographical latitude and time
  • P8: Bending of the telescope
  • P9: Sinosoidal correction in elevation ( proposed by B.H. Grahl )
    • Refraction terms

  • R: Correction due to refraction (derived from weather data)
  • R3: Factor for 3rd-order term in refraction (today:  0.065)
    • Other terms

  • HYSA: Hysteresis in azimut ( normally 0 ")
  • HYSE: Hysteresis in elevation (today: +2 ")
  • B1-B4: High-order correction-terms ( proposed by P. Brosche, today these values are not used)
  • Haz: Shift of horncenter in azimut (depending on receiver)
  • Hel: Shift of horncenter in elevation (depending on receiver)
  • AZtw: Constant eliminating the influence of the cable twist in azimut ( proposed by W.J. Altenhoff , todays value is +10 " per rotation of 360 degrees)
  • NULE and COL*are variabel additive constants, daily checked by the operator and hopefully by the observer.
  • NULA depends on cos(elevation) and will be determined if necessary.
  • RXAZ and RXEL are intended for variable feed-offsets.
    • Calculation of the Pointing Corrections

Azcorr = Azcorr' / cos(el)

Azcorr' = P20 + P10*cos(el) + P3*sin(el) + P4*sin(el)*cos(az) + P5*sin(el)*sin(az) + P6*sin(az)

Elcorr = P70 + Phorn + P8*cos(el) + P6*sin(el)*cos(az) - P4*sin(az) + P5*cos(az) + P9*sin(el) + R*ctg(el) + R3*ctg3(el)

with the following composed parameters:

  • ecc: Eccentricity of a horn in the focus ( actual value of today =0)
  • Beamdev: Beamdeviation factor ( different for the receivers)
  • SecFoc: Constant for secondary focus
  • K3: Constant depending on the actual value of FC3
  • POLind,FC1ind: Actual values of Polarization(Primefocus) and FC1
  • sign vel.: Sign of the actual velocity (az or el)
  • Azcomo: Commanded azimut-position in degrees
  • zd: Zenitdistance of position
  • Phorn = el - arcsin [cos(Haz) * cos(zd)]
  • P20 = P2 + COL* + RXAZ + ecc*sin(POLind - th)
  • P10 = P1 + Pcable + NULA + HYSA*(sign vel.) + ecc*cos(POLind - th)
  • P70 = P7 + NULE + RXEL + FC1ind*Beamdev + SecFoc*K3 + HYSE*(sign vel.)
  • Pcable = ( 230o - Azcomo) * Aztw
Today the main contributions come from the constants:
  • in azimut: P2(~20") *cos(el) and P3(~10")*sin(el)
  • in elevation: P9(~200")*sin(el) and P8(~160")*cos(el)
Every receiver in the telescope has its own set of pointing constants, which is automatically activated, if observations are made in the secondary focus using several receivers in paralell or at system startup, where the receiver in use is asked for. Because of the great number of available receivers in the telescope and because the constants are continously updated, they are not documented here, but the actual sets can be easily acquired at the telescope site.

      Correction Constants for the Foci

They have been introduced and determined by I. Pauliny-Toth and W.J. Altenhoff, 1972. Since that time they have not been changed (low frequencies mean less than ~5 GHz).

The values are in 10th of a millimeter
 

Primary Focus
Secondary Focus
Constant




dependency

low high frequencies low high
F1 1387 1427
1387 1427 FC1,elv
F2 136 83
136 83 FC1,elv
F3 -36 -36
-36 -36 FC2
F4 -163 -153
-163 -163 FC2
F5 1205 1205
1205 1205 FC2
F6 0 0
1620 1620 FC3

  • FC1: radial shift of the subreflector ("Radialverschiebung")
    • Assuming a focal length of 30 m for the telescope a shift of 1 mm gives 6.88 " in the sky (with a beamdeviation factor of 1).
  • FC2: focussing the subreflector ("Fokussierung")
  • FC3: tilt of the subreflector ("Kippung")
  • POL: Polarization rotation of the receiver
    • Calculation of the Focus Positions

FC1 = F1*cos(el) + F2 - [ 19610*(1-cos(K3)) + 32900*sin(K3)]

FC2 = F3*cos(el) + F4*sin(el) + F5 + [19610*sin(K3) + 32900*(1-cos(K3))]

FC3 = F6*cos(el) + 5.2 '

POL = (POLind - 555) * PI/10000

with the additional definitions:

K3 = 20 * [ 1 + sin ( [FC3ind-2500]*PI/5000) ] - 5.2 (in arc min)

FC3ind = actual value of FC3

PI = 3.142...

User Adjustable Pointing Constants

( The Daily Pointing )

For the daily adjustment of the telescope-pointing there exist the four parameters, which can be determined by automatic pointing and focussing procedures. These are additive to the built-in constants:

  • NULE >>> P7: Zero-shift in elevation-readout ( up to ca. +/- 20 " /day )
  • COL* >>> P2: Collimation of the telescope ( up to ca +/- 10 " /day )
These can be easily determined by cross scans in azimut and elevation
  • SFC2 >>> FC2: Radial focus position of the subreflector ( up to ca +/- 5 mm /day)
  • SFC1 >>> FC1: Radial shift of the subreflector ( normally not neccessary to adjust)
This parameter can in the same way automatically be determined by focus scans. The absolute value depends on the position of the receiver and varies.
  • NULA >>> P1: Zero-shift in azimut-readout
To determine this parameter one has to find out the azimut pointing at different elevations and to calculate the best fitting line in dependence on the cosine of elevation.

If the position-readouts in azimut have been newly set, it is strongly recommended to determine NULA, because there can be a difference to the before determined value.

  • RXAZ and RXEL can be used for receivers with more than one feed to specify the different offset positions of the feeds.

Other interesting Parameters

  • Normal weather-data including wind-velocity are continously monitored and are automatically used for corrections due to refraction (P9).
  • A temperature-profile of the actual temperatures at different points in the telescope-structure is continously monitored and archived in the observing data and also seperately archived for further analysis.
  • Inclinometer-data of the two telescope-towers are continously monitored during the observation and archived with the defined data-rate, but also archived with the temperature-profile of the telescope.
  • Some observers determined for special receivers certain values for the tilting (OFC3) or radial shift (OFC1) in connection with the primary box-position (OPOS) to optimize the system for their purpose.

Timescales and actual handling of the pointing

  • The so called invariable pointing constants are determined by accurate measurements of some days under good observing conditions in a timescale of some months. If in the meantime actual problems arise in the pointing, short "ad hoc" observations are scheduled to solve the problems.
  • The actual sets of the pointing constants for the different receivers can be printed out, if the observer wishes that for his documentation.
  • Besides the determination of the variable pointing constants (NULE,COL* ,SFC2) by the observer during his session, nearly every day the operators determine and document these variable constants by observations during their "system-test".
  • The determination or check of the Zero-point deviation in azimut (NULA) is only done if one suspects some deviations or if the azimut-readouts have been newly set.
  • The focus constants F1 - F6 have not been changed since the early days of the telescope.

Actual Problems with the Pointing

From the past we have no regularly spaced data of the development of the pointing constants at Effelsberg, apart the data taken irregularly during the official pointing sessions, once a year or every two years (using not always the same receivers). Since 1992 more and more problems in the azimut-pointing and -driving came up. Grinding of the telescope rail (1996) brought improvements concerning oscillations in azimut. Another part of the problem is, that nowadays receivers with wavelengths under 2 or 1 cm wavelength have more and more observing time. At these wavelengths the pointing of the telescope is very much more critical. Now we use for every receiver its own set of pointing constants and also we added new corrections. That again led to a better pointing than before. On the other hand it may be usefull for secondary focus observations to take the pointing of receivers at longer wavelengths for observations with receivers critical to bad weather conditions.

Actual problems are as follows:

  • At very slow actual velocities the telescope seems to make little "jumps" due to frictional effects ("Sägeeffekt").
  • The pointing in elevation sometimes shows significant residuals in the normal range of elevation, specially during not ideal weather conditions. ( Refraction ?)
  • Which values of the monitored weather-data best represent the model for calculation of the refractive index is not yet clear
  • The focus (very important at higher frequencies) changes with temperature, but in a manner not yet completely understood.

Some Advice

From the experiences of over 30 years of observations with the 100-m telescope one can derive some simple general rules, which unfortunately not always are respected by operators or observers, nevertheless they are very obvious :
  • The flux of the pointing- and focussing-sources should be as high as possible and of course point-like, otherwise one should make more (than the normal 4), but faster cross scans.
  • Point-like sources at longer wavelength not necessarily are point sources at smaller wavelength.
  • Pointing and focus should be checked some times during a period (the higher the frequency, the more), not only at the beginning.
  • The higher the observing frequency , the more on must be carefull with pointing and focussing.
  • Daily passages between night and day significantly change the pointing and especially the focus. Very critical seems the passage from night to day in the early morning.
  • Unbalanced sunshine on the telescope structure significantly changes pointing and focus during daytime.
  • Pointing should be done on sources nearby the object of interest, if it is too weak for pointing.
  • If the resulting pointing values of an observation show high differences to the normal documented ones, one should be very critical in using them as general solution.
  • First do a pointing, then adjust the focus and then use the next pointing for flux calibration.
      • Bibliography:

Stumpff P., Kleinheubacher Berichte,1972 ,15,431

Pauliny-Toth I., Altenhoff W., MPIfR-Interner Bericht,1972

Brosche P., AVN 1/1975,35

Altenhoff W. (Editor), "Workshop on Pointing Models", MPIfR Technischer Bericht Nr. 78,1996

Schraml J., Neidhöfer J., " OBSE, A User's Guide to the Observing Program at the 100-m Radio Telescope", MPIfR Technischer Bericht Nr. 71-2, April 1995

Neidhöfer J., " The Command Language OBSinp, Version for the Effelsberg 100-m RT ", MPIfR Technischer Bericht Nr. 77, July 1995


jneidhoefer_at_mpifr-bonn.mpg.de